ACCBoards

Full Version: The Left's "Rape" of Sarah Palin
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
This article may help explain why the assault on Sarah Palin continues unabated long after the election is over and she's stepped down as Governor of Alaska.

Quote:Then along came Sarah, and the attacks became particularly heinous. And I realized something even more chilling about the Left. Leftists not only sacrifice and disrespect women, but it's far worse: many are perpetuators.

The Left's behavior towards Palin is not politics as usual. By their laser-focus on her body and her sexuality, leftists are defiling her.

They are wilding her. And they do this with the full knowledge and complicity of the White House.

The Left has declared war on Palin because she threatens their existence. Liberals need women dependent and scared so that women, like blacks, will vote Democrat.

A strong, self-sufficient woman, Palin eschews liberal protection. Drop her off in the Alaskan bush and she'll survive just fine, thank you very much. Palin doesn't need or want anything from liberals -- not hate crimes legislation that coddles her, and not abortion, which she abhors.

Palin is a woman of deep and abiding faith. She takes no marching orders from messiah-like wannabes like Obama.

And so the Left must try to destroy her. And they are doing this in the most malicious of ways: by symbolically raping her.

Just like a perpetuator, they dehumanize her by objectifying her body. They undress her with their eyes.

They turn her into a piece of ass.

Liberals do this by calling her a c__t, ogling her legs, demeaning her with names like "slutty flight attendant" and "Trailer Park Barbie," and exposing her flesh on the cover of Newsweek.

And from Atlantic Magazine's Andrew Sullivan: "Sarah Palin's vagina is the font of all evil in the galaxy."

Nothing is off-limits, not actress Sandra Bernhard's wish that Palin be gang-raped or the sexualization of Palin's daughters.

Full article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/t...palin.html
Oh goody!

This one's gonna be SPECTACULAR!!1
NCTM will be frothing at the mouth Lol

Rock On
Cuz remember folks, it's only the left that talks about Sarah Palin.

Allhail

P.S. That article is right up Stampy's alley. Left=evil, Right=righteous
(11-25-2009 11:53 AM)ChrisL68 Wrote: [ -> ]Cuz remember folks, it's only the left that talks THAT WAY about Sarah Palin.

There.... fixed it for ya!

don bosco

Quote:The Left has declared war on Palin because she threatens their existence. Liberals need women dependent and scared so that women, like blacks, will vote Democrat.
Rolleyes

[Image: facepalm-face-palm-facepalm-demotivation...672935.jpg]

Seriously though, what is it with this victimhood fetish the right is perfecting in recent years? Weird.
I wish everyone would ignore her so she would just go away.
I would wager that anyone who was actually ever raped, wouldn't particularly care for the word being used in this context.


IMO, she has been unfairly treated. But 'raped'? Eh...
Then too, she could be more careful about word choice. I like her and think she's going to be just fine. Certainly won't cry for her. She doesn't need it.
Quote:Liberals need women dependent and scared so that women, like blacks, will vote Democrat.

Sexist, racist, absolutely degrading to women of all sorts, particularly us Paleocon women who did the ground work so females like this babe would even have a remote chance of being taken seriously in the world.

If the author of the article quoted is representative of the uberneocon segment, then count me as a "liberal" by choice because the Pub party I grew up with and loved has "done bit the dust and ain't never, no how, gonna be ever again".
Robin of Berkley (a recovering Liberal)
American Thinker

stampy--the bibliography of your waking life is strange--you know that, doncha? Big Grin:

Palin is a celebrity, more than she is a serious politician. As such, I assume a sex video will be available online within a matter of months. I'm hoping for a lezbo thing with Coulter.
(11-25-2009 12:23 PM)crufus Wrote: [ -> ]Rolleyes


Seriously though, what is it with this victimhood fetish the right is perfecting in recent years? Weird.

and amazingly amusing!
I wish that someone would persecute me and turn me into a multi-millionaire!
The funny thing about Stampy is that no matter how over the top the right-wing tripe is, he never questions it nor does he ever comment about how it might be over the top. He just licks it up and asks for seconds.
(11-25-2009 11:48 AM)fourcorners Wrote: [ -> ]NCTM will be frothing at the mouth Lol

Rock On

He'll figure out a way to call someone a retard, I'm sure.
Before someone takes me to task for demeaning stampy's reading habits let me post a typical day's reading for me.

Bible--Old Testament
Penthouse Magazine
Bible--New Testament

Almost always in that same order.
Sarah Palin is a clown and, as such, deserves to be laughed at. If anything, the focus on her has turned stale and we should move on to something fresh.
I suppose there is a some way Palin could win but odds are she is the second best thing the right can do for the left next to sending millions of American jobs to China. chances are she is a gift to the left. they don't hate her, don't want to destry her and want her as the face of the Republican party, along with El Rushbone
Yowza. I'm not going to bother to figure out who left that steaming pile of poop on Stampy's barcalounger, but that's a doozy. You know someone's off the rails when, to support his thesis that the Left's distaste for Sarah Palin has turned into a sexual perversion, you introduce as Exhibit A ... wait for it... the gay Catholic British Tory Andrew Sullivan.

Look, Sarah Palin has chosen to play celebrity; she basks in the derision of librulz. There is absolutely no reason to pity her; she has done and will continue to flourish in our grotesquely anti-intellectualized pop culture.

However, every thinking American owes it to the rest of us to do whatever it takes to keep the Palinbot away from the reins of power. As the scope of Palin's support clearly shows, our margin is thin.

don bosco

In other news, I understand that the folks over at FAUx have declared the "War on Christmas" to be ON AGAIN!!!!!111

[Image: war-on-christmas.jpg]
(11-25-2009 04:24 PM)sunnyheel Wrote: [ -> ]Yowza. I'm not going to bother to figure out who left that steaming pile of poop on Stampy's barcalounger, but that's a doozy. You know someone's off the rails when, to support his thesis that the Left's distaste for Sarah Palin has turned into a sexual perversion, you introduce as Exhibit A ... wait for it... the gay Catholic British Tory Andrew Sullivan.

Look, Sarah Palin has chosen to play celebrity; she basks in the derision of librulz. There is absolutely no reason to pity her; she has done and will continue to flourish in our grotesquely anti-intellectualized pop culture.

However, every thinking American owes it to the rest of us to do whatever it takes to keep the Palinbot away from the reins of power. As the scope of Palin's support clearly shows, our margin is thin.

^Agree with everything you said. ABSOLUTELY agree. The only thing I would add it is the same "anti-intellectual" crap that put Obama in office. Both parties seem to know they can float whatever dip$#|+ out there every four years and the masses will polarize, have it, and hopefully elect their guy (or gal).

Other than the Ying-Yang of right-left, there is not gnat's hair worth of difference between the two. Palin would be a disaster in office, BAD disaster.. just like Obama is proving out to be.
(11-25-2009 04:43 PM)Wolf Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-25-2009 04:24 PM)sunnyheel Wrote: [ -> ]Yowza. I'm not going to bother to figure out who left that steaming pile of poop on Stampy's barcalounger, but that's a doozy. You know someone's off the rails when, to support his thesis that the Left's distaste for Sarah Palin has turned into a sexual perversion, you introduce as Exhibit A ... wait for it... the gay Catholic British Tory Andrew Sullivan.

Look, Sarah Palin has chosen to play celebrity; she basks in the derision of librulz. There is absolutely no reason to pity her; she has done and will continue to flourish in our grotesquely anti-intellectualized pop culture.

However, every thinking American owes it to the rest of us to do whatever it takes to keep the Palinbot away from the reins of power. As the scope of Palin's support clearly shows, our margin is thin.

^Agree with everything you said. ABSOLUTELY agree. The only thing I would add it is the same "anti-intellectual" crap that put Obama in office. Both parties seem to know they can float whatever dip$#|+ out there every four years and the masses will polarize, have it, and hopefully elect their guy (or gal).

Other than the Ying-Yang of right-left, there is not gnat's hair worth of difference between the two. Palin would be a disaster in office, BAD disaster.. just like Obama is proving out to be.

Oh, please. I realize you hate Obama and librulz generally, but there couldn't be two politicians more unlike than Obama and Palin. Find some original material or just stick with the Obama=Hitler meme of your fellow teabaggers.

don bosco

Quote:Other than the Ying-Yang of right-left, there is not gnat's hair worth of difference between the two.

So Palin's a socialist too?
(11-25-2009 12:34 PM)AllBiz Wrote: [ -> ]I would wager that anyone who was actually ever raped, wouldn't particularly care for the word being used in this context.


IMO, she has been unfairly treated. But 'raped'? Eh...
Then too, she could be more careful about word choice. I like her and think she's going to be just fine. Certainly won't cry for her. She doesn't need it.

I agree rape is misused here, but there was once a man who suffered a "high tech lynching!" Maybe that would be a better description of what is being done to Palin.

No doubt Sarah Palin evokes hatred, most likely because at 46 with great looks, being fit and appealing and having attained more in her years then most of her detractors will ever achieve in their lives (despite being an alleged dimwit), I can see why she causes the out pouring of bile from the left.

As far as I can see the only person who should have a beef with the Palin mystique would be Anne Coulter as it seems every dollar Palin gets, Anne looses. Icon12
Is that the same thing as a SocialIZER? Cuz if so, count me in!
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's